US-JUSTICE-GAY-MARRIAGE : Photo d'actualité

US-JUSTICE-GAY-MARRIAGE

Crédits : 
JEWEL SAMAD / Employé
Plaintiff of the US v. Windsor case challenging the constitutionality of Section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), 83-year-old lesbian widow Edie Windsor shows a diamond pin which her partner gave as engagement gift as she makes a statement to the media in front the Supreme Court on March 27, 2013 in Washington, DC. The US Supreme Court tackled same-sex unions for a second day Wednesday, hearing arguments for and against the 1996 US law defining marriage as between one man and one woman. After the nine justices mulled arguments on a California law outlawing gay marriage on Tuesday, they took up a challenge to the constitutionality of the federal Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA). The 1996 law prevents couples who have tied the knot in nine states -- where same-sex marriage is legal -- from enjoying the same federal rights as heterosexual couples. AFP PHOTO/Jewel Samad (Photo credit should read JEWEL SAMAD/AFP/Getty Images)
Légende :
Plaintiff of the US v. Windsor case challenging the constitutionality of Section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), 83-year-old lesbian widow Edie Windsor shows a diamond pin which her partner gave as engagement gift as she makes a statement to the media in front the Supreme Court on March 27, 2013 in Washington, DC. The US Supreme Court tackled same-sex unions for a second day Wednesday, hearing arguments for and against the 1996 US law defining marriage as between one man and one woman. After the nine justices mulled arguments on a California law outlawing gay marriage on Tuesday, they took up a challenge to the constitutionality of the federal Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA). The 1996 law prevents couples who have tied the knot in nine states -- where same-sex marriage is legal -- from enjoying the same federal rights as heterosexual couples. AFP PHOTO/Jewel Samad (Photo credit should read JEWEL SAMAD/AFP/Getty Images)
Calculer le prixVoir le panier
Date de création :
27 mars 2013
Editorial - n° :
164726698
Infos autorisations :
Autorisation non disponible.Plus d'infos
Restrictions :
Contactez votre agence locale pour toute utilisation commerciale ou promotionnelle. Droits éditoriaux complets - Royaume-Uni, USA, Irlande, Italie, Espagne, Canada (exclut le Québec). A l'exception de ces pays, les droits éditoriaux sont limités. Veuillez nous contacter.
Type de licence :
Droits gérésLes droits des images de droits gérés sont cédés individuellement pour chaque utilisation. Le prix est calculé à partir de plusieurs facteurs tels que le tirage, la taille et l'emplacement de l'image, la durée d'utilisation, et le territoire de diffusion. Vous devrez renseigner des informations concernant l'utilisation que vous comptez faire du produit, afin de déterminer les droits d'utilisation de ce dernier.
Collection :
AFP
Crédits :
AFP/Getty Images
Taille max. de fichier :
3 064 x 4 200 px (108,09 x 148,17 cm) - 72 dpi - 4,3 Mo
Source :
AFP
Code barre :
AFP
Référence :
Was7405265

Mots-clés

Cette image est protégée par la loi sur le droit d'auteur. Getty Images se réserve le droit d'engager des poursuites en cas d’utilisation non autorisée de cette image ou de ce plan-séquence et de demander réparation pour violation de droits d'auteur. La disponibilité de cette image ne peut pas être garantie avant l'achat.
Plaintiff of the US v Windsor case challenging the constitutionality... Photo d'actualité 164726698Badge,Cadeau,Coupe transversale,Cour Suprême des États-Unis,Cour d'appel en dernier ressort,Diamant,Droit,Déclaration officielle,Défi,Edith Windsor,Fiançailles,Haut-lieu touristique international,Homosexualité féminine,Média,Palais de justice,Partenaire,Plaignant,Show,Système judiciaire,Vertical,Veuve,Washington DC,Windsor,États-UnisPhotographer Collection: AFP 2013 AFPPlaintiff of the US v. Windsor case challenging the constitutionality of Section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), 83-year-old lesbian widow Edie Windsor shows a diamond pin which her partner gave as engagement gift as she makes a statement to the media in front the Supreme Court on March 27, 2013 in Washington, DC. The US Supreme Court tackled same-sex unions for a second day Wednesday, hearing arguments for and against the 1996 US law defining marriage as between one man and one woman. After the nine justices mulled arguments on a California law outlawing gay marriage on Tuesday, they took up a challenge to the constitutionality of the federal Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA). The 1996 law prevents couples who have tied the knot in nine states -- where same-sex marriage is legal -- from enjoying the same federal rights as heterosexual couples. AFP PHOTO/Jewel Samad (Photo credit should read JEWEL SAMAD/AFP/Getty Images)